[Scummvm-devel] Suse 9.2 RPM

Willem Jan Palenstijn palenstijn at planet.nl
Fri Jan 14 10:32:14 CET 2005


On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 10:10 +0100, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> El Jueves 13 Enero 2005 20:58, Willem Jan Palenstijn escribió:
> > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 19:29 +0100, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> > > Hello, I compiled scummvm for SuSE Linix 9.2, and I put it up at:
> > >
> > > http://www.cirulla.net/listing/suse-rpm/9.2/
> > >
> > > i586 and source packages are available.
> > >
> > > I used SuSE spec file to build it, I had little/no adjustment to do to
> > > build the package.
> > > If you prefer to host the files on your site, you are welcome to grab
> > > them.
> > >
> > > The resulting program runs quite well on my machine, but I don't
> > > guarantee it will run on yours.
> >
> > The scummvm binary in your rpm (the .i586 one, anyway) isn't stripped
> > and is therefore 10Mb instead of the usual 3Mb.
> >
> > You also don't have flac(-devel), and libmpeg2(-devel) in the
> > BuildRequires which are needed for the Broken Sword cutscenes and
> > flac-compressed sound files.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the info, I'll apply your suggestions and rebuild the package 
> this weekend. I'm not sure on how to handle the stripping part, however.
> The big difference in size should be related to debugging symbols being 
> enabled (default SuSE rpm CFLAGS imply -g).

Yeah, the 'strip' tool strips those debugging symbols, but if SuSE
binaries usually have debugging symbols embedded, there's no harm in
leaving them in.

-Willem Jan






More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list