[Scummvm-devel] Switching to Git (was Re: Broken Sword 2.5)

Eugene Sandulenko sev at scummvm.org
Sun Aug 1 15:22:29 CEST 2010


On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:40:36 +0300
Ori Avtalion <ori at avtalion.name> wrote:
> These points may be relevant to all repositories, but are specific to
> ScummVM and Tools where there is "real" parallel development:
> 
> 1. Why keep the old branches around as git branches? The tags already
> point to their relevant heads, and I think only development lines that
> are being actively comitted to should be git branches. That way it
> will be more obvious when a development line is "closed".
There were commits to those branches, what to do with them?

> 2. Continuing from the previous point, why have the old tags as git
> branches instead of git tags?
It /may/ be valid for tools, we need to recheck that there were no
commits to the tags, if there were, same question, what to do with them?


Eugene




More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list