[Scummvm-devel] Fedora ScummVM package (Was: Merging TsAGE engine into trunk)
Tarek Soliman
tarek-spam at zeusmail.bounceme.net
Thu Apr 14 03:12:05 CEST 2011
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:38:57AM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
> On 2011-04-08 23:05, Max Horn wrote:
>
> > As an afterthought: Maybe we should modify our configure script to reject
> > --enable-all-engines when --enable-release is used?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. Should it throw an error, or just silently drop
> the --enable-all-engines flag? Also, should --enable-release prevent
> enabling all unstable engines, or is it just blanket statement
> --enable-all-engines that we want to block? (I guess you could argue
> that if you enable engines individually, then you probably know what you
> are doing, and that there may be cases when you want to try and compile
> even unstable engines with optimization.)
I am somewhat surprized to learn that it doesn't do that already, given
the changelog of the debian package:
>scummvm (1.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* Pass "--enable-release" to the configure script. This prevents
> the build of a few "work in progress" engines, which upstream
> doesn't see fit for general use yet.
>* Add a build conflict on liboss-salsa-dev to prevent the libsalsa
> emulation library being present in the buildd chroots. ScummVM
> itself builds fine with OSS support (Closes: #600655)
>
>-- Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm at debian.org> Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:51:42 +0100
--
Tarek
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list