[Scummvm-devel] Fedora ScummVM package (Was: Merging TsAGE engine into trunk)

Tarek Soliman tarek-spam at zeusmail.bounceme.net
Thu Apr 14 03:12:05 CEST 2011


On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 09:38:57AM +0200, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
> On 2011-04-08 23:05, Max Horn wrote:
> 
> > As an afterthought: Maybe we should modify our configure script to reject
>  > --enable-all-engines when --enable-release is used?
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me. Should it throw an error, or just silently drop 
> the --enable-all-engines flag? Also, should --enable-release prevent 
> enabling all unstable engines, or is it just blanket statement 
> --enable-all-engines that we want to block? (I guess you could argue 
> that if you enable engines individually, then you probably know what you 
> are doing, and that there may be cases when you want to try and compile 
> even unstable engines with optimization.)

I am somewhat surprized to learn that it doesn't do that already, given 
the changelog of the debian package:

>scummvm (1.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* Pass "--enable-release" to the configure script. This prevents
>  the build of a few "work in progress" engines, which upstream
>  doesn't see fit for general use yet.
>* Add a build conflict on liboss-salsa-dev to prevent the libsalsa
>  emulation library being present in the buildd chroots. ScummVM
>  itself builds fine with OSS support (Closes: #600655)
>
>-- Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm at debian.org>  Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:51:42 +0100

-- 
Tarek




More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list