<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Oystein Eftevaag <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wintermute@geheb.com">wintermute@geheb.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
For what it's worth, I personally believe ScummVM should've been at 1.0<br>
for a year or two now, if not more. I'm not a big fan of the whole<br>
Google beta status that so much of the open source community is sticking<br>
to these days.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div></div>I generally dislike making 'me too' posts, but I concur with all the points Oystein made - I too think ScummVM has been effectively '1.0' for several years. Extra features being added on would be nice, but I don't see them as critical, and I agree that we might as well go to 1.0 to avoid confusion about beta status. Extra features, like 16-bit support, can always be added on as version 1.1, 1.2, etc. releases.<br>
<br>Paul.<br>