<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Hi!<br>I am voting on getting the release out there! (2). As you say, if we make the release we get more testing, and a current known state. <br>Best regards<br>Lars<br><br>> From: max@quendi.de<br>> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:49:07 +0200<br>> To: kirben@optusnet.com.au<br>> CC: scummvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<br>> Subject: Re: [Scummvm-devel] ScummVM 1.1.0 has been tagged<br>> <br>> OK, tell you what, we'll do it this way: ScummVM is not a democracy nor communism, so normally we don't vote on anything, but rather the people who actually *do* something and work get to decide what they do etc., although of course they should coordinate with others etc. I am not willing to let myself be dictated on how I work, but I am willing to stop doing what I do if others see it as having a negative impact.<br>> <br>> So, for once, I'd like to conduct a vote. Poll is open till Saturday. Only ScummVM devs are allowed to vote, although of course everybody can voice his/her opinion. You vote by replying with an email to this thread. (I don't have the nerve to organize an anonymous voting scheme that ensures only devs can vote; if somebody neutral wants to organize that, go ahead.)<br>> <br>> <br>> Pick one:<br>> <br>> (1) We delay the release until "all open regressions" are resolved.<br>> <br>> (Where "all open regressions means" all bug repots of priority >= 7;<br>> everybody is asked to add other items to the list of regressions)<br>> <br>> In this case, Kirben will take over as release manager and organize it all.<br>> <br>> <br>> (2) We proceed as planned and make a 1.1.0 release<br>> <br>> (of course with the usual caveat: If some major new regressions pops up, we will<br>> reevaluate this).<br>> <br>> In this case, I'll proceed as release manager.<br>> <br>> <br>> I honestly don't mind either way. I absolutely can understand Kirben's concerns, it's just that our priorities differ. I really have no clue what others feel about this subject. Since everybody's reputation is at stake (in either case: either for regressions, or for delayed releases), I think it's fair to ask<br>> <br>> In addition, I would like to make it explicit that I ask for everybody's open and true opinion; I am not one to carry a grudge, so don't worry about voting "against" me. Despite popular believe, I don't mind differing opinions, I just mind people who don't put their money where their mouth is :-), and I am all in for a hot discussion, with shouting and flames, and afterwards we can still be good friends, I hope :-).<br>> <br>> <br>> Cheers,<br>> Max<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval<br>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs<br>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.<br>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.<br>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Scummvm-devel mailing list<br>> Scummvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<br>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel<br> <br /><hr />Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. <a href='https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969' target='_new'>Sign up now.</a></body>
</html>