<html><head></head><body><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">Hi Max,
<BR>
<BR>
A month seems like not a whole lot of time to test something as huge and complex as Scummvm.
<BR>
<BR>
If I was to choose, I would probably announce three months ahead of a new version being released. Branching could take place two months before the release.
<BR>
<BR>
Although hopefully the RC plans you mentioned would have the effect of extending the testing period anyway - that sounds good to me.
<BR>
<BR>
Also, I would like to chime in and say your work on Scummvm has been amazing and the project wouldn't be what it is today if you were to decide to leave - I hope you don't do that.
<BR>
<BR>
Regards,
<BR>
<BR>
- Neil
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Sent by emoze push mail
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----------------------------
<BR>
From: Max Horn" <max@quendi.de>
<BR>
Subject: Re: [Scummvm-devel] 3. Re: Release 1.1.0 status
<BR>
Date: 04th April 2010 11:08 am
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Am 01.04.2010 um 10:33 schrieb neil@millstone.demon.co.uk:
<BR>
<BR>
> Hi, I realise this is probably too late to help, but the DS port should have been fine if tagging did indeed happen on 31st March.
<BR>
Your commits were before the tagging, aye.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
> There were late breaking bugs, but have been sorted. I'd also like to repeat my plea for slighly more time for testing next time - I would have had trouble getting everything done if we had stuck to our original schedule.
<BR>
<BR>
I am not quite sure how many more weeks you need, Neil. You had over a month?
<BR>
<BR>
Bye,
<BR>
Max
<BR>
</body></html>