<div dir="ltr">Adding the checksums for the Debian repackaged versions was my idea, but since we don't want them, I'll revert the relevant commits<div><br></div><div style>Filippos</div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM, A. Milburn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fuzzie@users.sourceforge.net" target="_blank">fuzzie@users.sourceforge.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:18:55PM +0300, Eugene Sandulenko wrote:<br>
> Here is what present in original Debian "bugreport":<br>
><br>
> Files really are arj-compressed files, and the content includes *.exe<br>
> > files containing this string:<br>
> > > WATCOM C Run-Time system code is provided on an "as is" basis and is<br>
> > > (c) Copyright by WATCOM International Corp. 1988-1993. All rights<br>
> > > reserved.<br>
> > If WATCOM licensed its C Run-Time freely, then as a minimum that<br>
> > licensing should be documented together with above copyright holder in<br>
> > debian/copyright file.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Which is inconsistent and illogical.<br>
<br>
</div>Right, but that's not our bug and not our problem, so I don't see why we<br>
should worry about anything except what was reported to *us*, which was<br>
something different..<br>
<br>
- Alyssa<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>"Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes" - Oscar Wilde
</div>