<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Travis and the rest of the team.<br><br></div>ScummVM 2.0.0 is indeed still compatible with Windows XP - I just verified it by myself.<br><br></div>I made a horrible mistake when I added the comment about mingw-w64 having dropped Windows XP in the Wiki.<br><br></div>Current versions of MSYS2/Mingw-w64 will refuse to *install* on Windows XP, that's true. However, executables built with MSYS2/Mingw-w64 *will still run on Windows XP* without issues. I don't know if I even properly tested this back when I added this comment to the wiki... sorry for all the confusion and trouble this might have caused.<br><br></div>Best regards<br></div>Lothar<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-12-21 9:18 GMT+01:00 Travis Howell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kirben@optusnet.com.au" target="_blank">kirben@optusnet.com.au</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 21/12/2017 6:58 PM, Colin Snover wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On a side note, I'm still waiting for a response to my email about<br>
whether Windows XP support still works in the Windows build of ScummVM<br>
2.0.0, since it was mentioned as been built with mingw-w64. mingw-w64<br>
dropped Windows XP support, according to note on the mingw-w64<br>
compilation guide on the ScummVM wiki.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
In order to keep things on topic, anything not directly related to this<br>
Buildbot discussion, such as the existence of other manually created<br>
builds or missed responses to other emails, I would encourage you to<br>
create a separate thread or follow up directly with anyone else if you<br>
feel your needs have not been fully addressed. If you feel that this<br>
information is directly applicable to the discussion regarding the new<br>
Buildbot and the proposed worker image requirement, I would appreciate<br>
it if you could provide more clarification as to how it is so.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Just a quick response on this point, since it could be very important. The new Buildbot was used to build the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0, which uses the mingw-w64 compiler suite. I wanted to confirm Windows XP is still supported by the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0, as mingw-w64 is stated to have dropped Windows XP support on the ScummVM wiki ( <a href="http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/Compiling_ScummVM/MinGW-w64" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.<wbr>php/Compiling_ScummVM/MinGW-w6<wbr>4</a> ).<br>
<br>
I tried emailing you directly on 11th December 2017, requesting to ensure Windows XP support was still working in the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0, as mingw-w64 was stated as been used for the Windows build on IRC.<br>
<br>
I just want to make sure Windows XP support has not been broken, in the Windows release of ScummVM 2.0.0.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Scummvm-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.org" target="_blank">Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.or<wbr>g</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.scummvm.org/listi<wbr>nfo/scummvm-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>