<div dir="ltr">All the engines altogether are really smaller than just Glk.. mind blown! :)<div><br></div><div>DreamMaster.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:41 AM Eugene Sandulenko <<a href="mailto:sev@scummvm.org">sev@scummvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">The engines themselves are relatively small. So, not a huge overhead. GLK added much more overhead than the whole ResidualVM :)<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Eugene</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 16:14, Hubert Maier <<a href="mailto:Raziel_Nosgoth@web.de" target="_blank">Raziel_Nosgoth@web.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>Pretty cool.<br><br>I wonder if I'll still be able to build a static binary without running into memory issue while linking.<br><br>Do you know how big a static binary will grow with the residualvm additions?<br>And how much ram is consumed during linking?<br><br>Thanks and still, pretty cool<br>--<br>Take care,<br><br>Hubert</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Scummvm-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.org" target="_blank">Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Scummvm-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.org" target="_blank">Scummvm-devel@lists.scummvm.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>