[Scummvm-devel] Re: CVS: scummvm/scumm intern.h,2.117,2.118 script_v6.cpp,1.205,1.206 script_v8.cpp,2.199,2.200
Jonathan Gray
khalek at linuxgamers.net
Fri Nov 14 13:52:20 CET 2003
- Previous message: [Scummvm-devel] Re: CVS: scummvm/scumm intern.h,2.117,2.118 script _v6.cpp,1.205,1.206 script_v8.cpp,2.199,2.20
- Next message: [Scummvm-devel] Re: CVS: scummvm/scumm script_v2.cpp,2.211,2.212 script_v5.cpp,1.206,1.207
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, 09.11.03 um 23:12 Uhr schrieb Pawel Kolodziejski:
>
> > Update of /cvsroot/scummvm/scummvm/scumm
> > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv7950
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > intern.h script_v6.cpp script_v8.cpp
> > Log Message:
> > renamed some opcodes and added sobopcode comments
> >
>
> 1) May I ask why these name changes? In a few cases I can see a logic
> behind it. In others, I am actually surprised by the changed. E.g. why
> was renamed o6_ifClassOfIs() to o6_getClass() ? The opcode doesn't
> "get" the actor class, after all - it checks if the actor is in any of
> the given classes. And the opcode name isn't in sync with the
> corresponding V5 opcode anymore. That seems illogical.
I suspect this was done to match opcode names found in a binary?
regards
Jonathan
- Previous message: [Scummvm-devel] Re: CVS: scummvm/scumm intern.h,2.117,2.118 script _v6.cpp,1.205,1.206 script_v8.cpp,2.199,2.20
- Next message: [Scummvm-devel] Re: CVS: scummvm/scumm script_v2.cpp,2.211,2.212 script_v5.cpp,1.206,1.207
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list