Am 20.05.2004 um 22:52 schrieb Joost Peters: > Replying as requested. > I assume this won't make NASM a requirement on x86? i.e. not finding > it will have scummvm fall back on the C implementation? > I have no problems with this, as long as it is how Joost asks here. Nobody should be harmed by this change. Cheers, Max