[Scummvm-devel] Replacing Common::Map by std::map

[Marcus Comstedt]

Max Horn <max at quendi.de> writes:

> Indeed. Fully agreed. My point just was that the big bytes are mostly
> lost in other spots, like in the half dozen engines we now
> support. Furthermore, the good reasons are given in the part of the
> mail you didn't quote.

Well, you say that less code has to be maintained.  But is there
really much time spent on maintaining the Common::Map code now?
You also say that Common::Map does not use a balanced tree.  That may
be relevant if we're currently having performance issues with
Common::Map, but are we?


  // Marcus