[Scummvm-devel] Switch to SVN?

Max Horn max at quendi.de
Tue May 10 07:41:21 CEST 2005


Am 10.05.2005 um 15:52 schrieb Eugene Sandulenko:

> Torbjorn.E.Andersson at personec.com writes:
>> [sigh] As usual, I reply to the wrong address. Let's try this again.
>>
>> Max Horn <max at quendi.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I am all for it. Does anybody have serious objections 
>>> (as I
>>> stated on IRC, I don't want to hear things like "uh, I don't like the
>>> color of Subversion, and anyway, Arch is much more l33t" ;-) ? I'd 
>>> like
>>> to hear them...
>>
>> As long as it has some sort of counterparts to the CVS commands 
>> "checkout",
>> "update", "commit" and "log" I'm reasonably happy.
> Syntax is CVS-compatible, i.e. just do s/cvs/svn/ in all commands you
> used to use.
>
> Max: I'm all for it. We used SVN for gob engine when it was out of the
> main tree and I liked it. Especially because in overall it takes much
> less bandwitdh in day-to-day work and i'm still in dial-up.
>
> The questions are who will provide the repository, how safe will it
> be, what about backups etc.
>
Let's just say, I'll handle this and get back to you guys once I have 
something slightly more concrete... And if my current hope fails to 
work out, then in the "worst" case, we can always turn to icculus.org, 
I bet Ryan would be happily willing to host us.


Cheers,

Max





More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list