[Scummvm-devel] Re: [Scummvm-cvs-logs] SF.net SVN: scummvm: [22599] web/trunk/compatibility.php
Max Horn
max at quendi.de
Wed May 24 08:42:14 CEST 2006
Am 24.05.2006 um 12:43 schrieb Eugene Sandulenko:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 01:16:11 -0700
> fingolfin at users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
>> Revision: 22599
>> Author: fingolfin
>> Date: 2006-05-24 01:16:07 -0700 (Wed, 24 May 2006)
>> ViewCVS: http://svn.sourceforge.net/scummvm/?rev=22599&view=rev
>>
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Added Future Wars and Operation Stealth to the compatibility list
>> (TODO: Insert proper compat ratings)
> I didn't want to do it, neither advertise it on NEWS until some major
> issues are resolved, autodetection among them.
>
> Adding a game to our compatibility list means that we accept
> bugreports
> for it, and we're not yet ready for that :/
Ah well, we don't have to accept bug reports for that, after all,
*we* set the rules :-). But nevertheless, you are right, so far we
handled things that way. I'll remove fw & os again, sorry!
Am 24.05.2006 um 15:34 schrieb Torbjörn Andersson:
> Speaking of Future Wars and Operation Stealth, should we change their
> target names to something more descriptive than "fw" and "os" to avoid
> future conflicts?
I wouldn't mind that. Are there any techincal reasons for using fw
and os ? And what would the alternatives be? It would seem futurewars
and operationsstealth are a bit too verbose, aren't they? Maybe
"future" and "stealth" or "operation"? :-)
Cheers,
Max
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list