[Scummvm-devel] ScummVM binary size comparison

David Given dg at cowlark.com
Thu Nov 13 18:08:33 CET 2008

Max Horn wrote:
> Welll, I already implemented the "inline" version, at least GCC seems  
> to honor it just fine (at least when building with -Os or any other  
> non-zero optimization level). I would also expect MSVC to do so. As  
> Johannes said, if we encounter a compiler which has troubles with  
> this, we can still change it to the macro approach :)

Don't forget the new C/C++ vararg macro support; that'll provide a
syntax-compatible alternate implementation.

It also has the advantage that if faced with a really ancient compiler
that does neither empty inlines nor vararg macros, it should be
relatively straightforward to bolt on a third-party preprocessor and
make them work that way.

David Given
dg at cowlark.com

More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list