[Scummvm-devel] New engine merging procedure proposal

Eugene Sandulenko sev.mail at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 10:19:39 CEST 2011


On 20 June 2011 11:16, Max Horn <max at quendi.de> wrote:
>>> - Next I would like to see that every new engine needs a *public* OK from all
>>> our team leaders. This should help in agreeing on a consensus.
>> Yes, the team leader 'aye' was always the case since <ahem> RAW.
>
> Hmm, to be strictly accurate: I did never say "aye" for dreamweb, I merely ceased brining up counter arguments. And I guess my wording gave the impression as if I was all roses and sunshine now (but in reality, I just wanted to stay perfectly friendly and not ruin everybody's dinner part). I think Johannes point is exactly that he wants an explicit "OK, merge this" from all leads. I think that's a good idea. If the team leads can't agree, they will have to sit down and see if they can work out a compromise.
Well, I just had an impression of your 'OK' since you started to give
out suggestions on how to improve the code and conversion. The place
where those would take place in my opinion is irrelevant especially in
the light of the fact that we're merging back the history.


Eugene




More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list