[Scummvm-devel] branching and tagging

[Arnaud Boutonné]

Hi Willem, hi everyone,

I have no objection, it sounds perfectly fine to me. (so, +1 to everything
too)
I just have a question about a detail: what will trigger the end of
bugfixing of a branch? A delay? An explicit email?

Best regards,
Arnaud



On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Filippos Karapetis <bluegr at gmail.com>wrote:

> Sounds like the right way to go. Branch 1.3, for example, will reflect the
> latest
> bugfix release (i.e. 1.3.1), which is more correct than to name it 1.3.0.
> So, your
> proposal gets +1 vote from me :)
>
> Regards
> Filippos
>
> --
> "Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes" - Oscar Wilde
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Scummvm-devel mailing list
> Scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scummvm.org/pipermail/scummvm-devel/attachments/20110627/7c765fda/attachment.html>