[Scummvm-devel] engine names
Willem Jan Palenstijn
wjp at usecode.org
Sat Nov 19 18:39:47 CET 2011
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 04:45:46PM +0200, Eugene Sandulenko wrote:
> As it was always in the past, we prefer to use original engine name. The inly
> exceptions to those are Revolution games which historically have their names
> in ScummVM. I would really like that to stay as it is now.
Yes, I agree. But realistically, I have the impression that any time there was
any reason not to use the original engine name, we just didn't. (The Revolution
games you mention, and also the gob engine.) In the other cases the default of
the original engine name was entirely uncontroversial I think.
So I think this has been more of a "default choice" (with which I do agree, by
the way) than any strong "preference".
Anyway, I still feel naming an engine "Picture" is unnecessarily adding
confusion. (Same for CGE/Soltys, but of course that one already has a history
in our repo now.)
Since judging by the replies there's no real objection to renaming Picture to
Toltecs pre-merge, I'd like to go ahead with that.
-Willem Jan
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list