[Scummvm-devel] Mac OSX Supported Versions

Oystein Eftevaag oystein at geheb.com
Fri Nov 23 04:49:54 CET 2012


Actually, reproduced this locally now, with symbols. Callstacks attached to the tracker item.

On 22. nov. 2012, at 22:28, Oystein Eftevaag <oystein at geheb.com> wrote:

> Whether the binary is a merged architecture one or not won't cause allocation errors like the reported one, but differences in SDL versions definitely could. The tracker entry talks about the 3x scaler and only crashing in fullscreen mode, which also supports that. In either case, trying with the buildbot build should confirm it.
> 
> // Oystein
> 
> On 11/22/2012 9:08 PM, D G Turner wrote:
>> Oystein,
>>   As I don't have an OSX system, I can't test this myself, but I am
>>   under the impression that they did try running a buildbot branch-1-5
>>   or their own branch-1-5 builds and were not able to replicate the
>>   issue.
>> 
>>   There are some differences between the buildbot vs. your native
>>   builds. Primarily, the lack of PPC/Intel bundling into a DMG.
>> 
>>   This is a bit of a nightmare of a bug as it has only been replicated
>>   on the stripped release binary and thus debugging is much harder.
>> 
>>   We have now re-enabled buildbot producing stable (branch-1-5)
>>   builds and there are a number of snapshots available for testing here:
>>   http://buildbot.scummvm.org/snapshots/stable/
>> 
>>   If somaen, criezy or yourself can test with these, and compare them
>>   with the problematic release binary then I'd hope that we can manage
>>   to work out why this is happening...
>> 
>>   If there is any more help, I can provide please let me know.
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> David Turner
>> 
>> On 11/22/12 22:24, Oystein Eftevaag wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> It sounds like the crash doesn't occur with the 1.6.0 buildbot builds? The two 
>>> should essentially be identical from a toolchain point of view; could this 
>>> simply be something which has already been fixed since 1.5? Has anyone tried 
>>> reproducing this using the 1.5 branch?
>>> 
>>> // Oystein
>>> 
>>> On 11/14/2012 10:35 AM, Thierry Crozat wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your answer. At first glance the revised patch should be
>>>> good for 10.2 and 10.3. I can do the commit next week-end, and if I am
>>>> not too lazy I might even check that it compiles on my 10.3 machine
>>>> before committing.
>>>> 
>>>> While you are around, we had two users reporting a crash on Dreamweb
>>>> with the 1.5.0 release. Both somaen and myself managed to replicate
>>>> the crash with your release build but not with our own builds.
>>>> Seehttp://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3553538&group_id=37116&atid=418820
>>>> andhttp://forums.scummvm.org/viewtopic.php?t=11926
>>>> 
>>>> Do you have an idea what the issue may be?
>>>> Can you provide a build similar to the one you made for the release
>>>> but with debug symbols to help us find out what the issue is?
>>>> 
>>>> Thierry
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
>> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
>> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
>> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scummvm-devel mailing list
>> Scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scummvm.org/pipermail/scummvm-devel/attachments/20121122/0a8833ec/attachment.html>


More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list