[Scummvm-devel] ATTN: Proposed layout for git repository
Johannes Schickel
lordhoto at gmail.com
Sun Sep 23 21:41:57 CEST 2012
On 09/23/2012 08:37 PM, Eugene Sandulenko wrote:
> scummex/* --> scummex (??? it will go first in the list, but
> scummvm-scummex looks weird to me)
Indeed scummvm-scummex looks weird. Maybe we should skip it for now. If
there's anyone interested in ScummEX development we could setup a
special project for it.
> Now on the websites:
>
> Right, keeping them in subdirectories makes it tricky to autoupdate on
> the target sites. So let's ditch that.
>
> Option 1. Separate repo for everything
> buildbot --> scummvm-buildbot
> doxygen --> scummvm-doxygen
> forum/trunk --> scummvm-forum
> web/* --> scummvm-web
> web-planet -- scummvm-planet
> wiki/trunk -- scummvm-wiki
>
> Option 2. Put everything in branches on scummvm-sites.
> buildbot -> scummvm-sites:buildbot
> doxygen --> scummvm-sites:doxygen
> forum/trunk --> scummvm-sites:forum
> web/* --> scummvm-sites:master ??
> web-planet -- scummvm-sites:planet
> wiki/trunk -- scummvm-sites:wiki
>
> The problem with this option is that you have to pull everything for
> modifying just the buildbot scripts. Currently it takes about 350MB
> for -web repo. I'd say that's a lot. This was my primary reason why I
> proposed to put it into a separate repository.
>
> Option 3. Web separate in scummvm-web, rest is in branches on
> scummvm-sites or scummvm-web-other.
>
> Thoughts?
I think I would prefer a separate repo for everything in this case.
Working with branches for totally different data feels just wrong.
// Johannes
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list