[Scummvm-devel] Bringing our Core Code to another Level?

Adrian Astley adastley at gmail.com
Mon Aug 12 18:13:01 CEST 2013


What if we were to create individual libraries for different subsets
of the core? Aka, have one .lib for graphics, one for audio, etc. That
would allow third parties to choose which parts they want and which
they don't.

RichieSams


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, A. Milburn
<fuzzie at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:52:00PM +0300, Eugene Sandulenko wrote:
>> > I think such a split off core resulting in an unbranded (i.e. no ScummVM
>> > name on it except for credits to its origins) project would be a really
>> > nice thing to do in the long run.
>>
>> Now I completely fail to understand why we should not brand it as ScummVM
>> Library or ScummVM OSystem Library. Removing "ScummVM" brand from the
>> library title would diminish invaluable volunteer efforts of hundreds of
>> developers who made it exist in the first place.
>
> The branding isn't the name, though. If we leave it branded "ScummVM", then
> third-party projects would ship their binaries with "ScummVM" branding all
> over it. I don't think we want that (for support reasons if nothing else).
>
> Obviously it would be pointless to remove the ScummVM name from e.g. the
> credits or the source code or whatever; as Johannes said, we'd want to
> make sure that the origins of the code was clear and credited in any case.
>
>> I agree that it is a good idea to put OSystem and Common code into a
>> library, but it should stay within main scummvm github repository and be
>> branded as ScummVM.
>
> Well, putting it in a *library* would make no sense, it's only useful as
> a whole integrated binary.
>
> Right now any third-party project is clearly a "second-class citizen":
> they'd have to keep their own copy of the repository and merge ScummVM
> into it manually (as ResidualVM does), and manually modify a huge number
> of files. Having it separated (although not necessarily in a different
> repository) is the only way I can think of dealing with that.
>
> - Alyssa
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scummvm-devel mailing list
> Scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel




More information about the Scummvm-devel mailing list