No subject

 -Ender

> "J.Brown (Ender)" <ender at scummvm.org> writes:
>
> > The general idea sounds good, however changing the naming of stdafx is
> > somewhat annoying. MSVC precompiled headers require that exact filename in
> > a C++ application. Whilst the name CAN, I believe, be changed in some IDE
> > setting.. it's rather inconvienant.
>
> Does it require the header to be included directly by the C++ file?
> Otherwise we could have a dummy (empty) stdafx.h included from
> the Windows portdefs.h.
>
>
>   // Marcus
>
>