[Scummvm-tracker] [ScummVM :: Bugs] #11437: Consider using lgtm.com and codacy.com

[ScummVM :: Bugs]

#11437: Consider using lgtm.com and codacy.com
--------------------------+-----------------------
  Reporter:  necros2k7    |      Owner:  digitall
      Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  normal       |  Component:  --Other--
Resolution:  invalid      |   Keywords:
      Game:               |
--------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by digitall):

 * owner:  (none) => digitall
 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => invalid

Comment:

 Considered. Codacy is already used on all Pull Requests for ScummVM. We
 also use Coverity and various offline tools for static analysis. I think
 we are well covered. The main bottleneck is developer time to look at the
 results and fix / mark as false positives which adding further services
 will not improve.

 Closing.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.scummvm.org/ticket/11437#comment:1>
ScummVM :: Bugs <https://bugs.scummvm.org>
ScummVM