[Scummvm-devel] Branched.

[James 'Ender' Brown]

The main reason I didn't change HEAD's version number was because I
really couldn't decide on it. I'm not really happy with calling 'stable'
releases 0.6.x and also using 0.6.x in our development branch. And
boosting it to a higher number is, IMHO, misleading.

Perhaps something along the lines of just "0.6devel" without any
subversion numbers. Nobody ever bothers to boost them anyway :)

 - Ender

On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 19:23, Max Horn wrote:
> Am 16.02.2004 um 04:07 schrieb Hein-Pieter van Braam:
> 
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'd like to report that BASS appears to be in good shape!
> > one annoying bug that's filed now. No showstoppers imho
> > ScummVM 0.5.7cvs (Feb 16 2004 01:13:10)
> Thanks!
> >
> > PS: might it be a good idea to chance the version number of the 0.6.0
> > branch to 0.6.0-pre
> That already happened
> >  and current cvs to something like 0.6.9 or something
> > like that?
> >
> That is something we should probably do, yeah. Though "0.6.1-cvs" would 
> be more appropriate.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Scummvm-devel mailing list
> Scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel
>