[Scummvm-devel] Branched.
James 'Ender' Brown
ender at scummvm.org
Mon Feb 16 04:40:03 CET 2004
> Why? It's going to be the successor of 0.6.0 one day, and it already
> now has additional features which the 0.6.0 branch hasn't (and that
> will soon increase, once the FLAC patch and other things get checked
> in). So a higher version number seems logical to me...
Well, it's sensible in that regard (OT: argh, the FLAC patch. I am 100%
against this 'yet another audio format' and 'yet another scaler' thing
:P), but my point is mainly the below.
> I'd find that even more confusing, because to me, "0.6devel" is exactly
> the same as "0.6.0pre" - i.e. a development / prerelease version of
> 0.6.0. Which is not true, because HEAD is actually the successor of
> 0.6.0.
Yes, true. I just want to make a clear distinction between a development
tree and the stable tree. Expecially assuming (well, hoping :) that we
follow through with the idea of doing more regular point releases. As
you say later on. That is my main problem here, distinguising between
the two. And I really don't think that a higher version number makes
that clear enough. How about 0.7devel then?
- Ender
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list