[Scummvm-devel] 256KB reduced binary size vs. speed

[Pawel Kolodziejski]

> Max Horn writes:
>  > > For modern systems I think that speed decrease will be just few
>  > > percents, which doesn't really matters since there is no heavy
>  > > computations.
>  >
>  > Uhm? No heavy computation? The hq?x filters are *very* heavy in
>  > computation.
> Let me clarify myself. There is no heavy computations except
> scalers. Generally only smush playing on latter games eats resources.
Smush doesn't eat resources, only sdl backend with about 5-6 blits.

>  > >  But right now code size is kind of bloated and even more
>  > > to follow, that's why I vote for size.
>  > >
>  > Just to put this into relation, we are talking 3.1 MB vs 2.9 MB :-),
>  > i.e. less than 8%; OTOH we are also talking a speed difference of
>  > probably less than 5%.
> So you see the benefit. We gain 3%.
>
>
> Eugene
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Scummvm-devel mailing list
> Scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scummvm-devel
>
>