[Scummvm-devel] Switch to SVN?

[Eugene Sandulenko]

Torbjorn.E.Andersson at personec.com writes:
 > [sigh] As usual, I reply to the wrong address. Let's try this again.
 > 
 > Max Horn <max at quendi.de> wrote:
 > 
 > > Personally, I am all for it. Does anybody have serious objections (as I 
 > > stated on IRC, I don't want to hear things like "uh, I don't like the 
 > > color of Subversion, and anyway, Arch is much more l33t" ;-) ? I'd like 
 > > to hear them...
 > 
 > As long as it has some sort of counterparts to the CVS commands "checkout",
 > "update", "commit" and "log" I'm reasonably happy.
Syntax is CVS-compatible, i.e. just do s/cvs/svn/ in all commands you
used to use.

Max: I'm all for it. We used SVN for gob engine when it was out of the
main tree and I liked it. Especially because in overall it takes much
less bandwitdh in day-to-day work and i'm still in dial-up.

The questions are who will provide the repository, how safe will it
be, what about backups etc.


Eugene