[Scummvm-devel] RE : Re: RE : Re: Memory/speed loss in scumm engine

[Max Horn]

Am Mi, 2.04.2008, 10:42, schrieb Bertrand Augereau:
> Oh ok, didn't get that it was a sure thing the bloat
> was in the common code.
> Maybe somebody could try to see if the bloat impacts
> another platform between these 2 revisions, it would
> make the variation easier to track.
> I can probably do it tonight (in 10/12 hours), if
> nobody does it before.
>

I did check between revs 30345 (2008-01-06 15:04:18 +0100) and 30500
(2008-01-15 21:11:28 +0100), on a Debian x86 box. No unusual diffs in the
size of both the stripped and unstripped binaries. All made by running
"./configure" (only default engines, debug mode, not release mode, etc.)
followed by "make clean && make all".

Here a shortened output of ls -l:

25740673 Apr  2 13:28 scummvm-rev30300*
 6958728 Apr  2 13:28 scummvm-rev30300-stripped*
25734194 Apr  2 12:58 scummvm-rev30345*
 6958728 Apr  2 12:58 scummvm-rev30345-stripped*
25771848 Apr  2 13:14 scummvm-rev30400*
 6961672 Apr  2 13:14 scummvm-rev30400-stripped*
25782050 Apr  2 13:16 scummvm-rev30420*
 6965480 Apr  2 13:16 scummvm-rev30420-stripped*
25782110 Apr  2 13:20 scummvm-rev30440*
 6965480 Apr  2 13:20 scummvm-rev30440-stripped*
25756521 Apr  2 13:25 scummvm-rev30500*
 6965512 Apr  2 13:25 scummvm-rev30500-stripped*


Bye,
Max