[Scummvm-devel] Game testings
Alex Bevilacqua
alex at alexbevi.com
Wed Jul 6 14:43:19 CEST 2016
Based on what i've seen from the testing, I'm thinking linking tests to an
actual release may not be the most useful. Maybe we remove the release as a
link and just make it arbitrary:
[image: Inline images 1]
Effectively change *release_notes* to *release*, but make *release *an text
field.
Thoughts?
On 6 July 2016 at 08:34, Alex Bevilacqua <alex at alexbevi.com> wrote:
> I pushed out a new release that includes the following:
>
> * a396dc6 - GAMESDB: remove old release format from release#index
> * 74fbe52 - GAMESDB: add engine as a search field in games list
> * b12cad4 - GAMESDB: link to a user profile and show user's tests
> * d7c4c16 - GAMESDB: convert release tracking from major.minor.patch to an
> arbitrary name field
> * 06f8b10 - GAMESDB: don't require a comment as part of a test's validation
> * 6192302 - GAMESDB: allow tester to specify date test was performed
> * 688aa5f - GAMESDB: add a release stub to the activity stream
> * f17db7a - GAMESDB: link to game from test on activity stream
>
> Next i'm going to restructure slightly so that i can track developers and
> link them to games (instead of as arbitrary text). This will allow me to
> have link to developers so we can link to the wiki pages. I'll also add
> game links so they can link back to the wiki.
>
> On 19 June 2016 at 09:22, Eugene Sandulenko <sev.mail at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 19 Jun 2016, at 15:00, Thierry Crozat <criezy at scummvm.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, I mean non-released master. But we need to differentiate tests
>> made on the on-released master prior to 1.9.0 release with the ones made on
>> the official 1.9.0 release. Although maybe using 1.9.0 for both and using
>> the Release_notes field for example to specify that it was using the
>> non-released master (and possibly the git hash) would be fine.
>>
>> In this case we may use 1.9.0git for the hit version and 1.9.0 once we
>> have 1.9.0pre, e.g. the prerelease testing.
>>
>> In my test report I was using the gut hash as a comment.
>>
>>
>> Eugene
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scummvm.org/pipermail/scummvm-devel/attachments/20160706/0f1e3879/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15430 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.scummvm.org/pipermail/scummvm-devel/attachments/20160706/0f1e3879/attachment.png>
More information about the Scummvm-devel
mailing list