[Scummvm-devel] fsnode branch

[Filippos K]

My reasoning for removing it is that it was a snapshot of the 0.11.0 SVN tree, which was left at a point where the developer stopped working on that branch, and moved on to the main trunk. That's why I called it "outdated", it's not a "stable" branch like all the others, and it actually contains older code from the 0.11.0 SVN trunk, plus older code from david_corrales.
 
In any case, the only reason I proposed to remove it was for housekeeping, if you feel it should be kept then it should.
 
Regards
Filippos



> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:59:53 +0100> Subject: Re: [Scummvm-devel] fsnode branch> From: max at quendi.de> To: philipk79 at hotmail.com> CC: scummvm-devel at lists.sourceforge.net> > On Mi, Dezember 12, 2007 10:34, Filippos K wrote:> > Hello> >> > I was wondering, is there any reason to keep the fs-node branch anymore?> > All of the code in it has now been integrated into the main trunk, so is> > there any reason to keep this outdated branch around?> >> > Regards> > Why would we not keep it around? We also keep the "outdated" branches for> all previous ScummVM releases around. In fact, one of the main reasons to> use a version control system is so that you can still get hold of> "outdated" branches, releases etc. Which is important e.g. for regression> testing, and also to see the commit history / follow the developmement of> those branches, in order to analyze bugs, regressions, etc.> > In short: We would not gain anything by removing it, or any other branch.> But we would loose easy accessibility to it.> > > Bye,> Max
_________________________________________________________________
The best games are on Xbox 360.  Click here for a special offer on an Xbox 360 Console.
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/wheretobuy/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scummvm.org/pipermail/scummvm-devel/attachments/20071212/c53d537b/attachment.html>